Why the study?
Does non-invasive extra-cardiac arterial imaging improve individual cardiovascular risk prediction?
Does non-invasive extra-cardiac arterial imaging improve individual cardiovascular risk prediction?
Extra-cardiac arterial imaging techniques show potential for individual cardiovascular risk assessment but require further validation before clinical use as screening tests.
Noninvasive extra-cardiac arterial imaging should not yet guide cardiovascular risk screening; leaves open its role pending prospective validation.
Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death globally. Cardiovascular risk factors predict the risk of cardiovascular events in populations but have limitations in predicting individual risk. Emerging technologies that non-invasively measure carotid intima media thickness, aortic pressure and brachial artery reactivity may be useful in identifying the vulnerable patient who may benefit from more aggressive preventive therapy. These tests vary between each other in their reproducibility, cost, required operator skill, availability and patient preparation. However, all require further validation for clinical use as screening tests for cardiovascular disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nelson et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: