Why the study?
Does a dual demand pacemaker in the coronary sinus prevent attacks in a patient with refractory paroxysmal atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia?
Does a dual demand pacemaker in the coronary sinus prevent attacks in a patient with refractory paroxysmal atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Implantation of a dual demand pacemaker in the coronary sinus successfully controlled refractory paroxysmal AV nodal re-entrant tachycardia in a single patient.
A patient with refractory paroxysmal atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia had required direct current cardioversion to terminate attacks on 83 occasions. A dual demand pacemaker was implanted to sense and interrupt attacks of tachycardia automatically. The pacing electrode was positioned in the proximal coronary sinus near to the atrioventricular node; a site from which fixed rate underdrive pacing successfully interrupted attacks throughout a trial period of one week, with a lead left in this position on a temporary basis. Complete control of the arrhythmia was obtained in the six months after pacemaker implantation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
O’Keeffe et al. (1981) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: