Why the study?
The study aimed to compare hand grip strength and manual dexterity among academic, subspecialized surgeons.
Is surgical subspecialization associated with hand grip strength and manual dexterity in academic surgeons?
Is surgical subspecialization associated with hand grip strength and manual dexterity in academic surgeons?
Hand grip strength and manual dexterity differ by gender and age among surgeons, but are not associated with surgical subspecialty.
Comparable HGS and dexterity across surgeon groups; leaves open effects on operative performance.
The aim of this study was to compare hand grip strength (HGS) and manual dexterity of academic, subspecialized surgeons. A single-center cross-sectional study was performed among 61 surgeons. HGS was analysed with a hand dynamometer and manual dexterity was extensively analysed with a Purdue Pegboard Test. Correlations between HGS and manual dexterity and specific characteristics of the surgeons were analysed using Pearson's correlation coefficient (r). HGS and manual dexterity were comparable between surgeons from different specialities. HGS was positively correlated with male gender (r = 0.59, p < 0.001) and hand glove size (r = 0.61, p < 0.001), whereas manual dexterity was negatively correlated with male gender (r = −0.35, p = 0.006), age (r = −0.39, = 0.002), and hand glove size (r = −0.46, p < 0.001). Surgical subspecialization was not correlated with HGS or manual dexterity. Male surgeons have greater HGS, whereas female surgeons have better manual dexterity. Manual dexterity is also correlated with age, showing better scores for younger surgeons.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Constansia et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: