Device-related thrombus after left atrial appendage closure was independently associated with a higher risk of ischemic stroke or TIA (HR 4.39; 95% CI 1.05-18.43; P=0.04).
Cohort (n=469)
Yes
What is the incidence, predictors, and prognostic impact of device-related thrombosis after left atrial appendage occlusion in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Device-related thrombosis after LAA occlusion occurs in approximately 7.2% of patients per year and significantly increases the risk of subsequent ischemic stroke.
Hazard Ratio: 4.39 (95% CI 1.05–18.43)
p-value: p=0.04
BACKGROUND: Transcatheter left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion is an alternative strategy for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine the incidence, predictors, and prognosis of thrombus formation on devices in patients with AF who were treated with LAA closure. METHODS: The study retrospectively analyzed data from patients treated with 2 LAA closure devices seen in 8 centers in France from February 2012 to January 2017. RESULTS: A total of 469 consecutive patients with AF underwent LAA closure (272 Watchman devices Atritech, Boston Scientific, Natick, Massachusetts and 197 Amplatzer devices St. Jude Medical, Minneapolis, Minnesota). Mean follow-up was 13 ± 13 months, during which 339 (72.3%) patients underwent LAA imaging at least once. There were 98 major adverse events (26 thrombi on devices, 19 ischemic strokes, 2 transient ischemic attacks, 18 major hemorrhages, 33 deaths) recorded in 89 patients. The incidence of device-related thrombus in patients with LAA imaging was 7.2% per year. Older age (hazard ratio HR: 1.07 per 1-year increase; 95% confidence interval CI: 1.01 to 1.14; p = 0.02) and history of stroke (HR: 3.68; 95% CI: 1.17 to 11.62; p = 0.03) were predictors of thrombus formation on the devices, whereas dual antiplatelet therapy (HR: 0.10; 95% CI: 0.01 to 0.76; p = 0.03) and oral anticoagulation at discharge (HR: 0.26; 95% CI: 0.09 to 0.77; p = 0.02) were protective factors. Thrombus on the device (HR: 4.39; 95% CI: 1.05 to 18.43; p = 0.04) and vascular disease (HR: 5.03; 95% CI: 1.39 to 18.23; p = 0.01) were independent predictors of ischemic strokes and transient ischemic attacks during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Thrombus formation on the device is not uncommon in patients with AF who are treated by LAA closure. Such events are strongly associated with a higher risk of ischemic stroke during follow-up. (REgistry on Real-Life EXperience With Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion RELEXAO; NCT03279406).
“At this point, we don't really fully understand the etiology of device-associated thrombus, which is really one of the Achilles heels of this device therapy.”
Fauchier et al. (Sun,) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation (n=469). Device-related thrombus vs. No device-related thrombus was evaluated on Ischemic strokes and transient ischemic attacks (HR 4.39, 95% CI 1.05-18.43, p=0.04). Device-related thrombus after left atrial appendage closure was independently associated with a higher risk of ischemic stroke or TIA (HR 4.39; 95% CI 1.05-18.43; P=0.04).