Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of a laboratory-confirmed Chlamydia trachomatis (Ct) test result on subsequent sexual risk behavior in a large population-based screening program. METHODS: The study population consisted of 16- to 29-year-old participants of the Chlamydia Screening Implementation who completed Ct testing and questionnaires in 2 or more rounds. The influence of a Ct test result on sexual behavior was analyzed by generalized estimating equation models, in which the Ct test result of the previous round was the independent variable and 1 of the 8 sexual risk behavior indicators was the dependent variable, adjusted for covariates. RESULTS: Of 48,910 Chlamydia Screening Implementation participants with completed questionnaires and test results, 14.1% (n = 6802) and 2.6% (n = 1272) completed 2 and 3 rounds, respectively, and were included in this study. Analysis showed that Ct positives less often reported to "never" use condoms with a casual partner (%change pretest/posttest = -5.7% [-10.3 to -0.9]), whereas Ct negatives less often reported to "always" use condoms with a casual partner (-4.6% [-6.4 to -2.8]; odds ratio [95% confidence interval], 1.75 [1.09 to 2.80]). Ct positives also had more sexual partners in the subsequent round than did participants with a Ct-negative test result (relative risk [95% confidence interval], 1.14 [1.01 to 1.29]). CONCLUSIONS: Ct test results were associated with subsequent sexual risk behavior. In general, Ct positives were more likely to change their behavior after a Ct test result in a more positive and protective direction than Ct negatives, who were more likely to change their behavior toward more risky behavior. Effects over time after a Ct test should be investigated further, especially in the Ct negatives.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Soetens et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: