Why the study?
Clinical scores and biomarkers are well established tools for preoperative risk prediction, but their accuracy remains controversial.
What is the role of clinical scores and biomarkers in pre and postoperative risk management?
What is the role of clinical scores and biomarkers in pre and postoperative risk management?
Clinical risk scores and emerging biomarkers are valuable for preoperative cardiac risk assessment, though clinical judgment remains essential.
Guidelines endorse NSQIP/RCRI for preoperative risk; leaves open biomarker integration pending validation studies.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The goal of risk prediction is to identify high-risk patients who will benefit from further preoperative evaluation. Clinical scores and biomarkers are very well established tools for risk prediction but their accuracy remains a controversial issue. RECENT FINDINGS: Current guidelines recommend one of the risk tools for preoperative cardiac risk assessment: American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) calculator or Revised Cardiac Risk Index. Although not as easy to use as risk scores, risk models are more accurate and can predict individual patient risk more precisely. A step forward in risk estimation was performed by introducing new risk models developed from the American College of Surgeons NSQIP database - NSQIP surgical risk calculator and Myocardial Infarction or Cardiac Arrest index. Although biomarkers, especially in cardiac risk assessment, are already present in current European and American guidelines, this use is still controversial. Novel biomarkers: microRNAs, heart-type fatty acid-binding protein and mid-regional proadrenomedullin, can be used as new potential biomarkers in clinical practice. Also some of the experimental biomarkers have not yet been introduced into clinical practice, preliminary results are encouraging. SUMMARY: Different risk indices and biomarkers might lead to varying risk estimates. However, the importance of clinical judgment in risk assessment should not be underestimated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Janković et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: