Why the study?
Dexmedetomidine has been used as an adjuvant to local anesthetics to prolong analgesia after peripheral nerve blockade, but its effect when added to ropivacaine in supraclavicular brachial plexus block required assessment.
Does dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to ropivacaine improve the quality of block and post-operative analgesia in patients receiving a supraclavicular brachial plexus block?
Does dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to ropivacaine improve the quality of block and post-operative analgesia in patients receiving a supraclavicular brachial plexus block?
Adding dexmedetomidine to ropivacaine for supraclavicular brachial plexus block improves block characteristics and postoperative analgesia without increasing side effects.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May extend block duration in supraclavicular anesthesia; hypothesis-generating and requires larger trials before practice change.
Background: Dexmedetomidine has been used as an adjuvant added to local anesthetic to prolong analgesia following peripheral nerve blockade. We aimed at assessing the effect of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to ropivacaine in supraclavicular brachial plexus block. Materials and Methods: 80 patients of ASA grade I and II of age between 20-60 years of either sex were randomized into two equal groups. Group C received 0.5% ropivacaine (30cc) and Group D received 0.5% ropivacaine with 1 μg/kg dexmedetomidine (30cc). Results: Baseline data was comparable. Sensory and motor block onset was earlier; sensory and motor blockade was prolonged in Group D. Analgesia duration was longer in Group D. Postoperative VAS at 12 h was significantly lower in Group D. Conclusion: It can be concluded that dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to 0.5% ropivacaine in supraclavicular brachial plexus block shortens the sensory as well as motor block onset time, prolongs the sensory and motor block duration and time to first analgesic use, and decreases total analgesic use with no side-effects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ahuja et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: