Key result
Dexmedetomidine prolongs supraclavicular block analgesia by ~97 minutes versus dexamethasone.
Why the study?
Multiple adjuvants can potentiate regional anesthesia, prompting this comparison of dexmedetomidine versus dexamethasone added to ropivacaine on postoperative parameters.
Does dexmedetomidine prolong the duration of analgesia compared to dexamethasone when used as an adjuvant to ropivacaine in patients undergoing elective forearm and hand surgery under supraclavicular block?
RCT (n=104)
Double-blind
Block randomization
No
Does dexmedetomidine prolong the duration of analgesia compared to dexamethasone when used as an adjuvant to ropivacaine in patients undergoing elective forearm and hand surgery under supraclavicular block?
Absolute Event Rate: 1142.47% vs 1045.95%
p-value: p=0.00001
Dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to ropivacaine significantly prolongs the duration of analgesia and time to first rescue analgesic compared to dexamethasone in supraclavicular blocks.
Dexmedetomidine may prolong block duration and analgesia versus dexamethasone; leaves open optimal adjuvant selection pending larger confirmatory trials.
Background: There are many adjuvants imparting great efficacy and safety to the anaesthetic process. Drugs like steroid, alpha-2 agonist, opioid, epinephrine, midazolam, and naloxone are certain adjuvants used for potentiating block. The aim of the study was to compare the effect of dexmedetomidine and dexamethasone as adjuvant to ropivacaine on various postoperative parameters. Methods: All the patients were scheduled for elective surgery for forearm and hand under USG guided supraclavicular block. The randomisation was achieved by using block randomisation technique. The patients were randomly divided in to two groups. Group DM were received 15 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine with 100 µg one ml dexmedetomidine and group DS were received 15 ml of 0.5% of ropivacaine with 8 mg dexamethasone. Drug solution was prepared by same individual and was not part of study. Parameters observed were onset of motor block, onset of sensory block, duration of sensory block, duration of motor block. Results: The mean duration of analgesia was significantly prolong in dexmedetomidine (group DM) than dexamethasone group (DS) (1142.47±28.32 min vs 1045.95±78.55 min). Time for first rescue analgesic requirement was significantly prolong in dexmedetomidine (group DM) than dexamethasone group (DS) (17.44±2.41 hour vs 13.54±1.98 hours). Conclusions: The duration of sensory and motor block was significantly prolonged in Group DM as compared to Group DS. We have observed that the mean duration of analgesia was significantly prolonged in dexmedetomidine than dexamethasone group. Time for first rescue analgesic requirement was significantly prolonged in dexmedetomidine than dexamethasone group. There was no difference in adverse drug reaction between two groups.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mokkarala et al. (2022) conducted an RCT in Elective surgery for forearm and hand (n=104). Dexmedetomidine vs. Dexamethasone 8 mg was evaluated on Mean duration of analgesia (minutes) (p=0.00001). Dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to ropivacaine significantly prolonged the mean duration of analgesia compared to dexamethasone (1142.47 vs 1045.95 minutes, p=0.00001) in supraclavicular block.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: