Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The purpose of this paper was to evaluate the shrinkage behavior of a 316L molding feedstock. The methodology adopted a statistical approach (design of experiment) and a standard microshrinkage measurement approach. The statistical approach identified the mold temperature—parallel to the flow direction—and the combined effect of the holding and injection pressure—normal to the flow direction—as critical factors. In comparison with the polymer on which the feedstock was based, lower shrinkage values and fewer critical factors were observed. In conclusion, the lower shrinkage values were a consequence of the powder loading. The critical factors identified in the present work have found confirmation in the literature, except the absence of melt temperature between feedstock critical factors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Annicchiarico et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: