Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) is common among young people with epilepsy. Individuals who are at high-risk of SUDEP exhibit regional brain structural and functional connectivity (FC) alterations compared with low-risk patients. However, less is known about network-based FC differences among critical cortical and sub-cortical autonomic regulatory brain structures in temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) patients at high-risk of SUDEP. Methods 32 TLE patients were risk-stratified according to the following clinical criteria: age of epilepsy onset, duration of epilepsy, frequency of generalized tonic-clonic seizures and presence of nocturnal seizures, resulting in 14 high-risk and 18 low-risk cases. Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) signal time courses were extracted from 11 bilateral cortical and sub-cortical brain regions involved in autonomic and other regulatory processes. After computing all pairwise correlations, FC matrices were analysed using the network-based statistic. FC strength among the 11 brain regions was compared between the high- and low-risk patients. Increases and decreases in FC were sought, using high-risk > low-risk and low-risk > high-risk contrasts (with covariates age, gender, lateralisation of epilepsy and presence of hippocampal sclerosis). Results High-risk TLE patients showed a subnetwork with significantly reduced FC (t = 2.5, p = .029) involving the thalamus, brainstem, anterior cingulate, putamen and amygdala, and a second subnetwork with significantly elevated FC (t = 2.1, p = .031), which extended to medial/orbital frontal cortex, insula, hippocampus, amygdala, subcallosal cortex, brainstem, thalamus, caudate, and putamen. Conclusions TLE patients at high-risk of SUDEP showed widespread FC different between key autonomic regulatory brain regions compared to those at low-risk. The altered FC revealed here may help to shed light on the functional correlates of autonomic disturbances in epilepsy and mechanisms involved in SUDEP. Furthermore, these findings represent possible objective biomarkers which could help to identify high-risk patients and enhance SUDEP risk stratification via the use of non-invasive neuroimaging, which would require validation in larger cohorts, with extension to patients with other epilepsies and subjects who succumb to SUDEP.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Allen et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: