Why the study?
A symptom-based prediction rule was needed for early recognition of ACS in patients with acute chest discomfort calling out-of-hours primary care services.
Does a symptom-based prediction rule accurately identify acute coronary syndrome in patients calling out-of-hours primary care for acute chest discomfort?
Does a symptom-based prediction rule accurately identify acute coronary syndrome in patients calling out-of-hours primary care for acute chest discomfort?
A novel 7-predictor symptom-based model showed good discrimination (c-statistic 0.77) for early recognition of ACS in patients calling primary care out-of-hours services with acute chest discomfort.
Symptom-based ACS rule may aid OHS-PC triage; leaves open prospective validation and outcome impact before practice change.
OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a symptom-based prediction rule for early recognition of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in patients with acute chest discomfort who call out-of-hours services for primary care (OHS-PC). DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. A diagnostic prediction rule was developed with multivariable regression analyses. All models were validated with internal-external cross validation within seven OHS-PC locations. Both age and sex were analysed as statistical interaction terms, applying for age non-linear effects. SETTING: Seven OHS-PC in the Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: 2192 patients who called OHS-PC for acute chest discomfort (pain, pressure, tightness or discomfort) between 2014 and 2017. Backed up recordings of telephone triage conversations were analysed. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES MEASURES: Diagnosis of ACS retrieved from the patient's medical records in general practice, including hospital specialists discharge letters. Performance of the prediction rules was calculated with the c-statistic and the final model was chosen based on net benefit analyses. RESULTS: Among the 2192 patients who called the OHS-PC with acute chest discomfort, 8.3% females and 15.3% males had an ACS. The final diagnostic model included seven predictors (sex, age, acute onset of chest pain lasting less than 12 hours, a pressing/heavy character of the pain, radiation of the pain, sweating and calling at night). It had an adjusted c-statistic of 0.77 (95% CI 0.74 to 0.79) with good calibration. CONCLUSION: The final prediction model for ACS has good discrimination and calibration and shows promise for replacing the existing telephone triage rules for patients with acute chest discomfort in general practice and OHS-PC. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NTR7331.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wouters et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: