Why the study?
The study aimed to decrease primary care referrals to cardiology by 50% within 24 months for patients ages 7 to 21 years with low-probability cardiac pathology presenting with chest pain.
Does a quality improvement initiative reduce low-probability cardiology referrals in pediatric patients presenting with chest pain?
Does a quality improvement initiative reduce low-probability cardiology referrals in pediatric patients presenting with chest pain?
A multidisciplinary quality improvement initiative safely and effectively reduced low-probability cardiology referrals for pediatric patients with chest pain.
May reduce unnecessary pediatric cardiology referrals for low-probability chest pain; leaves open broader effectiveness and safety.
OBJECTIVE: To decrease referrals to cardiology of patients ages 7 to 21 years with low-probability cardiac pathology who presented to primary care with chest pain by 50% within 24 months. STUDY DESIGN: A multidisciplinary team designed and implemented an initiative consisting of 1) a decision support tool (DST), 2) educational sessions, 3) routine feedback to improve use of referral criteria, and 4) patient family education. Four pediatric practices, comprising 34 pediatricians and 7 nurse practitioners, were included in this study. We tracked progress via statistical process control charts. RESULTS: A total of 421 patients ages 7 to 21 years presented with chest pain to their pediatrician. The utilization of the DST increased from baseline of 16% to 68%. Concurrently, the percentage of low-probability cardiology referrals in pediatric patients ages 7 to 21 years who presented with chest pain decreased from 17% to 5% after our interventions. At a median follow-up time of 0.9 years (interquartile range, 0.3-1.6 years), no patient had a life-threatening cardiac event. CONCLUSION: Our health care improvement initiative to reduce low-probability cardiology referrals for children presenting to primary care practices with chest pain was feasible, effective, and safe.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Harahsheh et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: