Key result
Implementation of a SCAMP for pediatric chest pain significantly reduced the use of exercise stress tests (3% vs 29%; P<0.001) and other monitors compared to a historical cohort.
Why the study?
Does a Standardized Clinical Assessment and Management Plan (SCAMP) reduce resource utilization in pediatric patients presenting with chest pain?
Cohort (n=770)
Does a Standardized Clinical Assessment and Management Plan (SCAMP) reduce resource utilization in pediatric patients presenting with chest pain?
Absolute Event Rate: 3% vs 29%
p-value: p=<0.001
Implementation of a standardized clinical assessment and management plan (SCAMP) for pediatric chest pain significantly reduces practice variation and unnecessary cardiac testing.
SCAMP implementation was associated with reduced testing in pediatric chest pain; hypothesis-generating for standardized pathways, prospective validation needed.
BACKGROUND: Chest pain is a common reason for referral to pediatric cardiologists. Although pediatric chest pain is rarely attributable to serious cardiac pathology, extensive and costly evaluation is often performed. We have implemented a standardized approach to pediatric chest pain in our pediatric cardiology clinics as part of a broader quality improvement initiative termed Standardized Clinical Assessment and Management Plans (SCAMPs). In this study, we evaluate the impact of a SCAMP for chest pain on practice variation and resource utilization. METHODS AND RESULTS: We compared demographic variables, clinical characteristics, and cardiac testing in a historical cohort (n=406) of patients presenting to our outpatient division for initial evaluation of chest pain in the most recent pre-SCAMP calendar year (2009) to patients enrolled in the chest pain SCAMP (n=364). Demographic variables including age at presentation, sex, and clinical characteristics were similar between groups. Adherence to the SCAMP algorithm for echocardiography was 84%. Practice variation decreased significantly after implementation of the SCAMP (P<0.001). The number of exercise stress tests obtained was significantly lower in the SCAMP-enrolled patients compared with the historic cohort (∼3% of patients versus 29%, respectively; P<0.001). Similarly, there was a 66% decrease in utilization of Holter monitors and 75% decrease in the use of long-term event monitors after implementation of the chest pain SCAMP (P=0.003 and P<0.001, respectively). The number of echocardiograms obtained was similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a SCAMP for evaluation of pediatric chest pain has lead to a decrease in practice variation and resource utilization. (J Am Heart Assoc. 2012;1:jah3-e000349 doi: 10.1161/JAHA.111.000349.).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Verghese et al. (2012) conducted a cohort in Pediatric chest pain (n=770). Standardized Clinical Assessment and Management Plan (SCAMP) vs. Historical cohort (pre-SCAMP) was evaluated on Use of exercise stress tests (p=<0.001). Implementation of a SCAMP for pediatric chest pain significantly reduced the use of exercise stress tests (3% vs 29%; P<0.001) and other monitors compared to a historical cohort.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: