Key result
Niacin increases diabetes risk, while PCSK9 inhibitors, ezetimibe, and fibrates show no concerning glycemic effects.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Since the publication of the JUPITER trial, attention has been focused on the adverse glycemic effects of statin therapy. Although the modest increase in the risk of new diabetes mellitus is outweighed by the reduction in cardiovascular events for statins, emerging biochemical and genetic links between lipid metabolism and glycemic control raise the prospect of a broader diabetogenic effect of lipid-lowering therapies. For the novel and powerful PCSK9-inhibitor class available evidence does not support a major glycaemic effect with the results of large scale trials awaited although preliminary genetic data does suggest a link. In contrast, there is clear evidence of a diabetogenic effect for the now outdated but well-studied niacin. For ezetimibe and fibrates, evidence is scarce but currently broadly unconcerning. For now, the glycemic effects of lipid-lowering therapies should have a limited influence on clinical decision-making. Further study in this topical area is needed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Collins et al. (2016) conducted a review in Dyslipidemia and glycemic control / diabetes mellitus. Non-statin lipid-lowering therapies (PCSK9 inhibitors, niacin, ezetimibe, fibrates) was evaluated on Adverse glycemic effects / new-onset diabetes mellitus. Non-statin lipid-lowering therapies show varied glycemic effects: niacin is clearly diabetogenic, while PCSK9 inhibitors, ezetimibe, and fibrates currently lack concerning clinical evidence.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: