Study modifies a terrorism model considering recidivism in imprisoned terrorists, suggesting intervention strategies.
Terrorism poses a serious threat to national security, particularly when former terrorist inmates return to active duty due to the failure of deradicalization programs. This study modifies the $SETPR$ model by adding a direct recidivism path from the imprisoned compartment (\(P\)) to the active terrorist compartment (\(T\)) via the parameter \(k\). This model consists of five subpopulations: the susceptible (\(S\)), the exposed (\(E\)), active terrorists (\(T\)), imprisoned (\(P\)), and subpopulation that has ceased terrorist activities (\(R\)). The basic reproduction number is given by \(R_0,\) which is derived using the next-generation matrix method and serves as a threshold parameter for the spread of terrorism. Local stability analysis shows that the terrorism-free equilibrium is locally asymptotically stable if \(R_0 1\), while the endemic equilibrium is locally asymptotically stable if \(R_0 1\). Numerical simulations using Matlab R2013a and Maple 11 show that when \(R_0 = 0.0039 1\), the system converges to the terrorism-free equilibrium, meaning terrorism will become extinct. Conversely, with \(R_0 = 5.8535 1\), the system is stable at the endemic equilibrium, indicating that terrorism persists at a positive level. These results show that it is important to control key parameters through integrated intervention strategies, so that the \(R_0\) value can be reduced below unity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fauziyah et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: