Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This randomized trial analyzes dosimetric impacts of setup errors and anatomical changes in patients receiving radiotherapy, suggesting improved accuracy for treatment plans.
Abstract Objective: Traditional radiotherapy dosimetric analyses are often limited by cone-beam CT artifacts and correlated longitudinal data mismanagement. This study uses artifact-free fan-beam CT (FBCT) and a generalized linear mixed Lasso (glmmLasso) model to decouple interfraction setup errors and anatomical deformations within a simulated image-guided radiotherapy workflow, providing quantitative support for future site-specific ART research. Approach: We retrospectively analyzed 84 patients (head and neck [H&N], thorax, pelvis; n=28 each). Weekly diagnostic-quality FBCTs served as ground truth. To isolate error sources, we recalculated 1,260 dose distributions under three scenarios: isolated setup errors, isolated deformations, and combined effects. A glmmLasso model, using patient-specific random intercepts and L1 penalization, identified the primary geometric drivers of dosimetric variation. Main results: H&N exhibited minimal setup deviations (< 2.0 mm); dosimetric variance was driven by inter-patient baseline heterogeneity (ICC > 0.73) rather than interfraction deformations. Thoracic setup uncertainties (mean ≈ 4.0 mm) reduced minimum target dose up to 50% for displacements ≥ 5 mm, but overall variance was primarily governed by non-rigid deformations (marginal R² = 0.423). Pelvic anatomy demonstrated pronounced variability due to bladder filling (DSC: 0.2-0.9), and the coupled scenario further amplified relative deviations in bladder and femoral-head dose metrics. Significance: Utilizing FBCT and high-dimensional feature selection, we decoupled site-specific drivers of dosimetric variation. Quantifying these coupled effects establishes a robust, validated foundation for tailored potential factors to inform ART decision-making. .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: