Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Proposes that care is essential for humanitarian response, suggesting effective systems transformation through feminist leadership.
In a time of escalating crises, rising authoritarianism, and erosion of global solidarity, this paper argues that humanitarian response can be reimagined through the lens of care. Drawing from feminist leadership theory and field-based insights, this paper proposes care as a core principle of humanitarian preparedness and response, not a secondary or sentimental value. It contends that women's community-based networks—grounded in co-creation, collective design, and knowledge of safety and need—already embody a practical form of systems transformation often overlooked by formal humanitarian structures. Through a feminist lens, "care" is reframed as both method and power: an organising principle that dissolves hierarchies, strengthens social cohesion, and restores humanity in leadership. The paper calls for humanitarian organisations to recognise care as operational strategy, epistemology, and ethical infrastructure in times of crisis. Integrating care as a guiding principle of humanitarian system design implies strategic shifts: from coordination to co-creation, from compliance-based models to those grounded in trust and adaptive capacity, and from procedural efficiency to relational ethics. The paper argues that the invisible architecture of care already offers a living blueprint for systems transformation—the challenge for humanitarian leadership is to make it visible, valuable, and central.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Francesca Paola Traglia (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: