Randomized trial defines governance for AI-robotic transitions, emphasizing human continuity and policy semantics, indicating future implications.
BIT-ARTRC-001 defines a distinct governance object: an exact material structural transition mediated by artificial intelligence and robotics. It separates machine capability from displacement authority and treats human continuity, physical viability, benefit-burden incidence, meaningful human judgment, contestability, recovery, and obligation settlement as non-compensatory constraints. The R1 pre-canonical charter locks an exact transition object, the typed state family M/H/B/Q/O, nine three-valued admission gates, sixteen constitutional articles, seven conditional analytic cores, and an evidence-only handoff to the existing CVC/CARL authority chain. Its F5 bounded policy kernel evaluates 1,310,720 assignments across five transition profiles and nine core gates. All 18 targeted countermodels are rejected or held according to the locked semantics, while a separate closed-form checker reports zero count mismatch. The finite result establishes internal consistency only within the declared policy semantics. This record does not claim binding law, field validation, legal sufficiency, social optimality, proof-assistant verification, production safety, or novelty. The deposit contains a readable PDF, an editable DOCX source, and a reproducibility archive containing the mission contract, machine-readable semantic specification, source and prior-art ledgers, evaluator, independent checker, execution logs, closure manifest, and SHA-256 checksums.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Quang Trịnh Bùi (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: