Comparative assessment reveals higher vulnerability in Bhatta due to inadequate waste management systems, indicating the need for decentralized approaches.
Municipal solid waste management is an increasing environmental and public health challenge in rapidly transitioning rural and peri-urban regions of India, where infrastructural expansion and shifting consumption patterns are altering waste profiles and governance capacity. However, limited empirical evidence exists on how socio-economic conditions, service access, and institutional arrangements shape community vulnerability in such transitional settings. This study comparatively assesses MSW management practices and vulnerability in two contrasting villages: Bhatta (Uttar Pradesh), a peri-urban transition settlement lacking formal waste services, and Puthuppally (Kerala), characterized by decentralized community-led waste management. A cross-sectional mixed-methods design integrated Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA), household surveys ( n = 437), waste characterization, Spearman correlation analysis, and an IPCC-based vulnerability framework. Bhatta recorded higher median daily waste generation (≈ 2.0 kg/day) than Puthuppally (≈ 1.7 kg/day), with stronger income–waste correlations (ρ = 0.34) and limited institutional mediation. In contrast, Puthuppally exhibited weaker income dependence and stronger service-linked behavioral patterns. Vulnerability assessment showed 63% of Bhatta households in high-vulnerability categories due to high exposure and low adaptive capacity, whereas Puthuppally demonstrated stronger adaptive systems and lower sensitivity. The findings emphasize the importance of decentralized, context-specific MSW management systems in reducing rural waste-related risks and strengthening institutional resilience.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gautam et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: