Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Feasibility study evaluates quarry by-products in otta seal surfacing, suggesting enhanced performance for local roads.
Otta seal, a surface treatment method that typically employs locally sourced low-quality aggregates, has been recognized as a cost-effective and sustainable option for bituminous surfacing of low-volume roads. Because quarry by-products (QBs), sand-sized residues from quarrying operations, remain largely underutilized despite being readily available and exhibiting well-graded behavior, offering potential for use in Otta seal applications, a feasibility study on incorporating QBs into Otta seal design was conducted using adaptations of existing chip seal design methods: (1) modified McLeod; (2) modified Kearby; and (3) Austroads methods. The laboratory study on Otta-seal specimens incorporating QBs revealed that optimal lab-scale specimen preparation was achieved with a double-layer configuration where aggregates were separated using a No.8 sieve (2.36 mm). Using an optimized lab specimen configuration, three design methods were evaluated with two QBs and one typical Otta-seal aggregate as a control. Performance tests using sweep testing and a modified Hamburg Wheel Tracker (HWT) showed that specimens prepared with QBs demonstrated comparable or superior aggregate retention compared with those with typical Otta-seal aggregate, highlighting the feasibility of incorporating QBs in Otta seals. Among the design methods, the modified Kearby method consistently delivered the best performance, with an adequate binder/aggregate ratio resulting in the lowest aggregate loss in the sweep and modified HWT testing. Texture properties computed using close-range photogrammetry effectively captured the macro-surface texture of the Otta-seal specimens, accounting for the physical characteristics of QBs and typical Otta-seal aggregates and demonstrated an inverse relationship between surface roughness and aggregate retention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mahala et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: