Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Essay argues that lawfare weakens international religious freedom law, highlighting implications for religious liberty.
This essay argues that international religious freedom law is structurally vulnerable to lawfare because its core concepts remain legally indeterminate and lack a stable moral foundation. Using China's treatment of Uyghur Muslims in Xinjiang as a case study, it demonstrates how undefined terms, expansive limitation clauses, and state-centered interpretation permit governments to restrict religious liberty while maintaining formal legal compliance. Existing procedural reforms address symptoms rather than foundations. The essay concludes that recovering natural law as a basis for human dignity and rights offers a more durable framework for protecting religious freedom against manipulation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Emmitt Maxwell Furner (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: