Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Case study shows AI enhances co-creation and integration in citizens’ assemblies, indicating new possibilities for deliberative democracy.
Citizens’ Assemblies and other deliberative mini-publics (DMPs) are institutions designed to foster democratic deliberation. AI systems, especially large language models (LLMs), have been suggested as tools to scale up the breadth and depth of DMPs. We distinguish six core functions within democratic deliberation – representation, perspective-giving and taking, inquiry, co-creation, integration, and decision-making – and point out some potential benefits of AI in each of these functions. Our case study presents the results of the Citizens’ Assembly on Energy, organised in Finland in 2025, in which an LLM was used in inquiry, co-creation, and integration. We found that while LLMs have some shortcomings in terms of inquiry, especially in creating questions for experts, they can ease the workload of human facilitators and deliberators in co-creation and integration. Our findings contribute to the emerging debate on the optimal division of labour in deliberative processes between human deliberators, facilitators, and generative AI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jäske et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: