Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cross-sectional study evaluates allergic rhinitis burden in medical students, indicating significant academic impacts.
Allergic rhinitis (AR) represents a prevalent and recurring health concern globally in a day to day life basis, affecting individuals across all age groups. Studies have proved that there has been a significant rise in its prevalence over the past few decades, making it one of the most common chronic respiratory disorders worldwide. The aim of this study is to analyse the burden of allergic rhinitis among the medical and paramedical students of Sikkim, evaluate common symptoms and various triggering factors, and to analyse the impact of AR on the performance of students on a day-to-day basis. This is a cross-sectional study carried out among the medical and paramedical students of Sikkim Manipal Institute of Medical Sciences (SMIMS), Sikkim Manipal College of Nursing (SMCON) and Sikkim Manipal College of Physiotherapy (SMCPT). After obtaining informed consent, participants were asked to complete a structured questionnaire in the form of google forms. The questionnaires answered were then analysed statistically. Among the 461 participants with mean age of 20.99 ± 1.78 years, 23.86% reported having AR and 24.51% had a positive family history. Awareness was high (82%), likely due to medical background. The most common symptoms were sneezing (48.3%), nasal itching, and rhinorrhoea. Major allergens included household dust and pollen. AR significantly affected sleep (35.14%), daily activities (33.84%), academic performance (29.72%), and confidence (20.39%). Antihistamines were the most commonly used medications. Statistical analysis showed significant associations between AR and impaired quality of life. AR is prevalent among healthcare students and exerts a measurable impact on their academic and daily performance. Early diagnosis, increased awareness, and use of non-sedating pharmacological interventions are essential to improve health outcomes and productivity in this population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Talukdar et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: