Review examines automation and digital solutions to enhance measurement accuracy and reliability in laboratories, highlighting key barriers.
Calibration laboratories are essential to industrial quality, safety, regulatory compliance, and equipment reliability, yet many laboratories still depend on fragmented software, manual transcription, static certificates, fixed calibration intervals, and isolated uncertainty calculations. This review examines how smart calibration laboratories can improve measurement accuracy and operational reliability through automation, digital calibration certificates, connected instruments, machine-readable metrological data, virtual experiments, cloud services, and risk-based management. A structured review of thirty publications issued between 2020 and 2024 was conducted using PRISMA 2020 principles. The evidence shows that digitalisation creates value only when measurement traceability, uncertainty, environmental control, equipment identity, data integrity, and human authorisation remain explicit. Automated data capture reduces transcription errors and cycle time; digital calibration certificates enable software to interpret results and uncertainty; virtual experiments strengthen uncertainty evaluation; and calibration-management platforms improve planning, status visibility, and audit readiness. However, interoperability, cybersecurity, semantic consistency, legacy integration, competence, and validation remain major barriers. The paper proposes a five-layer smart-laboratory framework comprising connected standards and instruments, controlled calibration execution, automated uncertainty and conformity evaluation, trusted digital records, and reliability analytics. It also defines implementation gates and performance indicators for energy and industrial facilities, where pressure, flow, temperature, electrical, mechanical, and high-voltage instruments directly influence plant availability and safety. The review concludes that a smart calibration laboratory is not simply a laboratory with more software. It is a governed measurement system in which every result is traceable, machine-actionable, uncertainty-aware, secure, and connected to operational decisions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mohammed Javeed (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: