Retrospective cohort study shows improved survival in older adults with advanced NSCLC receiving immunotherapy.
Older patients are underrepresented in clinical trials of immunotherapy for driver gene-negative advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aimed to investigate real-world efficacy and safety of immunotherapy in this population. Clinical data from 649 patients aged ≥ 65 years with advanced NSCLC were retrospectively analyzed. Patients received either first-line immunotherapy ( n = 389), including Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) plus chemotherapy ( n = 298) and ICI monotherapy ( n = 91), or chemotherapy ( n = 260). Objective response rates (ORRs), disease control rates (DCRs), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events were compared. Cox regression analyses identified independent prognostic factors. Immunotherapy yielded higher ORR (44.73% vs. 31.54%, P = 0.001) and DCR (85.60% vs. 76.54%, P = 0.003) than did chemotherapy. The median PFS and OS in the Immunotherapy group were 9.57 and 19.27 months, respectively; mOS in the ICI-Chemotherapy group was significantly longer by 3.3 months compared with the ICI-alone group ( P = 0.043). Among the immunotherapy cohort with available PD-L1 expression data ( n = 218), PD-L1 TPS ≥ 50% consistently demonstrated better outcomes than TPS < 1%. In the overall cohort, immunotherapy and baseline ECOG PS 0–1 were protective factors for PFS and OS, whereas baseline liver metastasis was a risk factor for PFS only. Regarding safety, the incidence of any-grade Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) (62.2% vs. 68.1%) and grade ≥ 3 TRAEs (37.5% vs. 40.0%) did not differ significantly between the Immunotherapy and Chemotherapy groups. First-line immunotherapy significantly improves survival in older patients with advanced NSCLC. Immunotherapy plus chemotherapy is superior to immunotherapy alone regarding OS, with manageable safety.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhong et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: