Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Finds industrial policy raises AI investment in firms, suggesting governance affects outcomes.
Whether industrial policy can steer firms toward frontier technology depends on internal governance. A difference-in-differences design built around China’s 13th Five-Year Strategic Emerging Industries Plan of 2016 shows that the policy raised AI investment intensity among A-share listed firms by roughly 13% relative to the sample mean. Dual agency costs condition this effect in opposite directions. Equity incentives, which lower Type I agency costs, amplify it, whereas controlling shareholder share pledging, which raises Type II agency costs, attenuates it. Corporate governance thus filters policy intent into frontier technology investment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Qingfeng Ding (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: