Difference-in-differences analysis reveals increased corporate digital innovation following AI pilot zone initiatives, indicating inclusive gains for non-high-tech firms.
Purpose This study aims to examine whether the New Generation AI Innovation and Development Pilot Zones policy, launched by China in 2019, promotes corporate digital technology innovation and identifies the boundaries of its impact. Design/methodology/approach This study integrates regional innovation system theory, information asymmetry theory, and dynamic capability theory. Using data from Chinese A-share companies from 2010 to 2024, we employ a staggered difference-in-differences model to examine the policy effects. Furthermore, through panel regression and heteroskedasticity tests, we observe how the policy effect varies across different firm characteristics. Finally, we examine the boundaries of the policy effect across firms with different financing constraints and dynamic capabilities. Findings First, the policy enhances corporate digital technology innovation. Second, the policy exhibits a certain degree of inclusiveness, with its impacts benefiting small- and medium-sized enterprises, non-high-tech companies, and firms in central and western regions, and it generates spillover effects. Third, the policy effect is weakened by firms' financing constraints. For firms under high financing constraints, engagement in AI strategic management can effectively mitigate the negative impact of financing constraints, and AI capital stock can also alleviate this negative impact to a certain extent. Finally, the policy-driven innovation improves corporate future sales and carbon productivity. Originality/value First, this research identifies the policy's primary beneficiaries and the varying responses of firms to the policy. It thereby clarifies the firm-level boundaries required for the policy to convert into innovation output. Second, if the government can supplement with appropriate financial support and encourage firms to engage in low-cost strategic communication and to accumulate appropriate capital, it may help enhance the policy's conversion efficiency.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: