Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Consensus study advocates for well-being as a key measure in trials, highlighting its importance for patients.
Psychiatric trials typically define success as symptom reduction, yet patients prioritize meaning, vitality, and functioning. This imbalance undervalues experiential benefits, distorting clinical, policy, and FDA decisions. Psychedelic trials illustrate this, where robust well-being gains sometimes accompany modest symptom effects. We argue well-being should be elevated to co-primary endpoint status, propose a Delphi-developed consensus well-being instrument with rigorous validation, and outline guardrails preventing approval of therapies that worsen the underlying condition.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marseille et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: