Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Investigates how platforms create indebted subjects in China, highlighting implications for governance and financial behavior.
Drawing on thousands of digital narratives from Chinese online debtor communities, this paper investigates the paradoxical expansion of platform-mediated debt in a traditionally high-savings society. It demonstrates how platforms systematically manufacture indebted subjects through a three-stage trajectory: ‘benevolent lure’ at enrolment, ‘managed crisis’ of illusory control during entanglement, and ‘coercive inversion’ triggered by algorithmic betrayal. By conceptualizing the platforms as an ‘affective infrastructure’ – an apparatus engineered to produce, manage and capitalize on borrowers’ affective states – this study reframes our understanding of financial subjugation in the digital age. Ultimately, this paper shifts the analytical focus from discrete financial transactions to a processual regime of affective governance, revealing how platforms actively choreograph the lived experience of over-indebtedness at the intersection of platform power, state-led governance and contemporary precarity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xinmiao Song (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: