Key result
Late IV thrombolysis boosts excellent 90-day stroke functional outcomes by ~22% over control.
Why the study?
Does intravenous thrombolysis improve functional outcomes in adults with acute ischemic stroke presenting 4.5 hours or more after symptom onset?
Meta-Analysis (n=4,174)
Does intravenous thrombolysis improve functional outcomes in adults with acute ischemic stroke presenting 4.5 hours or more after symptom onset?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Intravenous thrombolysis beyond 4.5 hours improves functional outcomes in imaging-selected patients with acute ischemic stroke, despite an increased risk of symptomatic ICH.
Importance: Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) is an established therapy for acute ischemic stroke when administered within 4.5 hours of symptom onset. However, many patients present beyond this window or with unknown onset, and recent randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have evaluated whether imaging-selected patients may benefit from thrombolysis in the extended window. Objective: To evaluate the functional and safety outcomes associated with IVT administered 4.5 hours or more after stroke onset. Data Sources: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were systematically searched from database inception through March 3, 2026. Study Selection: RCTs enrolling adults with acute ischemic stroke treated with IVT 4.5 hours or more after symptom onset were included. Trials comparing thrombolysis with placebo or standard medical care and reporting functional or safety outcomes were eligible. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Data were extracted independently by 2 reviewers following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Risk ratios (RRs) and mean differences with 95% CIs were pooled using random-effects models. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcomes were excellent functional outcome (modified Rankin scale scores of 0-1 at 90 days), good functional outcome (modified Rankin scale scores of 0-2 at 90 days), all-cause 90-day mortality, and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). Results: Fourteen RCTs including 4174 patients (2102 in the thrombolysis group and 2072 in the control group) were analyzed, 9 of which were published within the past 5 years. IVT was associated with a higher likelihood of excellent functional outcome (RR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.14-1.31) and good functional outcome (RR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.06-1.18) at 90 days. Mortality did not differ between groups (RR, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.93-1.38), but thrombolysis was associated with an increased the risk of symptomatic ICH (RR, 2.44; 95% CI, 1.45-4.09). Absolute treatment effects corresponded to a number needed to treat of 12 to 16 for an additional favorable outcome and a number needed to harm of 62 for symptomatic ICH. Conclusions and Relevance: In this systematic review and meta-analysis of 14 RCTs, IVT administered beyond 4.5 hours after stroke onset was associated with improved functional outcomes despite an increased risk of symptomatic ICH, supporting extension of thrombolytic therapy beyond the conventional treatment window in appropriately imaging-selected patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Patel et al. (2026) conducted a meta-analysis in Acute ischemic stroke (n=4,174). Intravenous thrombolysis vs. Placebo or standard medical care was evaluated on Excellent functional outcome (modified Rankin scale scores of 0-1 at 90 days) (RR 1.22, 95% CI 1.14-1.31, p=<0.001). Intravenous thrombolysis administered 4.5 hours or more after stroke onset increased the likelihood of excellent functional outcome at 90 days compared to control.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: