Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Systematic review maps applications of generative AI in manufacturing, highlighting challenges and future development directions.
Generative artificial intelligence (GAI) is expanding from model-centered research into engineering and manufacturing activities, but its scope and maturity remain uneven. This PRISMA-guided bibliometric and abstract-level thematic review maps peer-reviewed industrial GAI research published from 2022 to 4 June 2026. Searches of Scopus, Web of Science, and the ACM Digital Library identified 492 records; 119 duplicates and 121 ineligible records were removed, leaving 252 studies. Keyword normalization, co-occurrence analysis, dominant and secondary thematic coding, and an abstract-reported evidence characterization were applied. The corpus shows two connected trajectories: engineering generation based on generative models for design, topology, materials, and electronics, and knowledge-intensive industrial intelligence based on large language models, retrieval-augmented generation, knowledge graphs, agents, and human–AI collaboration. Most studies report empirical or computational evaluation (72.2%), but 84.5% remain research-stage; only 0.8% indicate operational industrial evidence in their abstracts. The findings, therefore, distinguish publication activity from deployment maturity. Priority requirements for adoption include domain-grounded data, verification, manufacturability checks, traceability, cybersecurity, intellectual property protection, system integration, workforce preparation, and human accountability. This review contributes a reproducible cross-domain map, an overlap-aware synthesis, and stakeholder-specific guidance for trustworthy industrial GAI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ilieva et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: