Key result
New trial protocol evaluates whether single-anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass improves two-year BMI versus sleeve gastrectomy.
Why the study?
Preliminary data for single-anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass are promising, but evidence from adequately powered randomized head-to-head comparisons against sleeve gastrectomy is scarce.
Does single-anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass improve change in body mass index compared to sleeve gastrectomy in patients with severe obesity?
RCT
1:1
Yes
Does single-anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass improve change in body mass index compared to sleeve gastrectomy in patients with severe obesity?
This trial protocol outlines a study to compare the efficacy and safety of single-anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy for severe obesity.
First powered RCT of SASI bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy; extends preliminary data and informs metabolic surgery choices in class II obesity.
BACKGROUND: Single-anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass is a novel metabolic bariatric surgery intended to enhance metabolic outcomes and reduce the risk of postoperative complications. Although preliminary outcome data for single-anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass are promising, evidence from adequately powered, randomized head-to-head comparisons is scarce. This trial compares the efficacy and safety of single-anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy in patients with class II obesity (body mass index = 35.0-39.9 kg/m²) with at least one obesity‑related comorbidity or class III obesity (body mass index ⩾40.0 kg/m²). METHODS: This two-center randomized clinical superiority trial enrolls patients eligible for metabolic bariatric surgery at two specialized Norwegian centers. Included patients are randomly assigned (1:1) to either single-anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass or sleeve gastrectomy with standardized perioperative treatment and care. The primary endpoint is the between-group difference in change in body mass index from baseline to 2 years after single-anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy. Secondary endpoints include additional weight loss outcomes, the prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease, surgical and postoperative complications, obesity-related comorbidities, nutritional status, bone mineral density, gastrointestinal symptoms, quality of life, and rates of revisional and conversion surgery. All endpoints will be evaluated at 2 and 5 years after surgery. Statistical analyses utilize linear mixed models and analysis of covariance within an intention-to-treat framework. DISCUSSION: This trial will provide high-level evidence with robust and comparative outcome data on single-anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass and sleeve gastrectomy, aiming to clarify the clinical utility of single-anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass and inform surgical practice. Findings will address gaps in medium- and long-term evidence regarding weight loss, safety, comorbidity resolution, and quality of life following single-anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Haug et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Severe obesity. Single-anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass vs. Sleeve gastrectomy was evaluated on Between-group difference in change in body mass index from baseline to 2 years. This randomized clinical superiority trial protocol will evaluate whether single-anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass improves body mass index change at 2 years compared to sleeve gastrectomy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: