Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Systematic review shows uncertain weight loss and metabolic improvements in patients after SASI surgery, suggesting further studies are needed.
Single anastomosis sleeve ileal (SASI) bypass combines sleeve gastrectomy with intestinal bipartition to promote weight loss and metabolic improvement. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing SASI with sleeve gastrectomy (1 RCT and 4 non-randomized comparative studies (NRCTs)), one-anastomosis gastric bypass (2 RCTs, 4 NRCTs), and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (2 NRCTs), regarding weight loss, metabolic and nutritional outcomes, and adverse effects. Certainty of evidence was assessed with GRADE for 1-year outcomes. Twenty-six studies (1603 patients) were included, mostly reporting 12-month results. Pooled single-arm analysis from 11 studies showed mean total weight loss of 35.9 kg (95% CI 33.3–38.5). The certainty of evidence ranged from low to very low, limiting confidence in the results and emphasizing the need for high-quality RCTs. We are very uncertain whether SASI differs from SG, OAGB, or RYGB for weight loss at 12 months (very low-certainty evidence). SASI may result in better outcomes for diabetes remission compared to SG (low-certainty evidence), but we are very uncertain about comparisons with OAGB and RYGB (very low-certainty evidence). The evidence base consists of few, small studies with substantial methodological limitations, and data beyond 12 months are scarce. High-quality, adequately powered RCTs with standardized techniques and longer follow-up are needed to establish the comparative effectiveness of SASI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Haug et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: