Analyzes constitutional rupture in 628 CE and its enduring impact on Chinese psychopathology, suggesting significant implications for understanding historical tensions.
English Abstract: This paper is a long-term psychopathological diagnosis within the "Productive Political Philosophy" framework, integrating two previous studies: "The Constitutional Revolution of 628 CE" and "From Structural Rupture to Psychopathology." It argues that Emperor Taizong's 628 CE abolition of the Duke of Zhou and elevation of Confucius was a decisive constitutional rupture—replacing meritocratic principles with heart-mind ethics, permanently separating "ritual" from "warfare," and transforming the emperor from the "supreme organizer for ensuring communal survival" into a "ruler of supreme moral authority." Following this rupture, Chinese civilization underwent a millennial process of psychopathological deterioration: Song Confucians completed "ontological castration"—theoretically eliminating practical achievement from the essence of "complete personhood"; Ming Confucians descended into "parasitic consolidation"—degenerating into rent-seeking groups loyal only to family interests; and Wang Yangming's School of Mind became the ultimate closure of this deterioration chain, with morality fully privatized and elites fully de-responsibilized. Through a structural comparison of Europe's "retrieving subjectivity" and China's "embedded subjectivity," the paper reveals that both pathologies share the same root diagnosis: the separation of ritual and warfare. China's pathology is the "endogenous collapse" of a primary civilization—after the 628 CE rupture, lacking external reference systems, it could only turn inward, deepening with each step.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
鑫培 骆 (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: