Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates C/t's impact on S+ production sensitivity in humans, suggesting variable effects.
Humans and nonhumans tend to display undermatching for stimuli positively correlated with reinforcement (i.e., S+s). C/t ratios are a method of quantifying the temporal informativeness of S+s, which may help account for varied levels of sensitivity to relative S+ production rate. However, researchers have yet to investigate the effects of C/t on choice in this context. Therefore, the purpose of the current study was to evaluate the influence of C/t on sensitivity to relative S+ production rate in a concurrent observing-response procedure with human participants. Each participant experienced eight conditions in which C/t and relative S+ production rate varied. Specifically, four relative S+ production rates were programmed with either low or high C/t. We evaluated differences in sensitivity by comparing multilevel regression models with and without C/t as a fixed-effect parameter and by comparing fits of the generalized matching equation across each participant's low- and high-C/t conditions. Our results suggest that participants' behavior was sensitive to relative S+ production rate. Surprisingly, participants' behavior tended to be more sensitive in their low-C/t conditions relative to their high-C/t conditions, but the magnitude of differences varied across participants.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Blakemore et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: