There has been considerable debate over both the ontology and ethical permissibility of so-called ‘deathbots,’ ‘thanabots,’ or ‘Interactive Personality Constructs of the Dead’ (IPCDs) - AI-driven software programs that emulate the conversational style of a person who has died. This paper explores two possible candidates for the ontological status of IPCDs: ‘remnant personhood,’ as recently argued for by Jurgis Karpus and Anna Strasser, and ‘animated persona,’ a category recently articulated by Masahiro Morioka. Both candidates are shown to pick out important features of IPCDs, while also having distinctive drawbacks. I conclude by exploring the possibility that these categories, instead of being exclusive, might be complementary lenses through which we can consider IPCDs – and that this dual focus helps us to better understand where the ethical and psychological dangers of this technology may lie.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Patrick Stokes (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: