Commentary critiques politicization of belonging in higher education, highlighting its financial benefits for institutions.
In this commentary, I trace the evolution of “sense of belonging” from a foundational psychological construct to a widely studied element of student experience in higher education, particularly for marginalized groups. I also differentiate between the idea of belonging as a psychological construct and as a sociopolitical one, acknowledging its complexities. I then critique the recent politicization of the term, illustrating how its association with DEI initiatives has led to censorship pressures that undermine research and institutional decision-making, with some examples from my own personal and professional experiences. Next, I present evidence to suggest that fostering belonging is financially advantageous for colleges and universities through its positive effects on recruitment, retention, graduation, and alumni engagement. Finally, I include a call to action for institutional leaders to respond to government pressure with principled advocacy and continued support for belonging.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Angie L. Miller (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: