Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Multicentre proof-of-concept study evaluates time to positivity of HBsAg assay as a virological activity marker.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Point-of-care (POC) diagnostics for hepatitis B virus (HBV) are limited to qualitative results. This study evaluated whether the time to positivity of a rapid HBsAg assay could serve as a surrogate marker of quantitative HBsAg (qHBsAg) and virological activity. METHODS: This multicentre, prospective proof-of-concept study included cohorts from Spain and Ethiopia. Adults with chronic or resolved HBV infection and healthy controls were enrolled. Paired venous and capillary blood samples were collected; capillary blood was tested with Determine HBsAg2 rapid test recording time to positivity, while qHBsAg and HBV DNA were measured using immunoassay and PCR, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 513 HBsAg-positive individuals were included (263 Spain; 250 Ethiopia). All healthy controls and individuals with resolved infection tested negative. Time to positivity showed an inverse correlation with qHBsAg in both cohorts (Spain: r = -0.749; Ethiopia: r = -0.374; p < 0.001 for both). No association was observed between time to positivity and HBV DNA levels. The performance to identify patients with HBsAg levels < 1000 IU/mL was higher in Spain (AUROC 0.86) than in Ethiopia (AUROC 0.65). Better performance was observed for detecting HBsAg levels < 100 IU/mL in both countries (AUROC 0.96 and 0.77, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Time to positivity in a rapid HBsAg assay correlated inversely with qHBsAg and may provide a simple, semi-quantitative estimate of antigen burden. Although unrelated to HBV DNA, it could expand the utility of point-of-care HBsAg testing beyond qualitative diagnosis, particularly where quantitative HBsAg assays are unavailable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jemberu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: