Why the study?
Do mobile health (mHealth) interventions improve cardiac rehabilitation outcomes compared to conventional programs in coronary heart disease patients?
Do mobile health (mHealth) interventions improve cardiac rehabilitation outcomes compared to conventional programs in coronary heart disease patients?
Current evidence from RCTs shows inconsistent effects of mHealth interventions on cardiac rehabilitation outcomes in patients with coronary heart disease.
mHealth effects on CHD rehab outcomes remain inconsistent; leaves open need for larger theory-based RCTs before clinical adoption.
Objective Mobile health (mHealth) provides an innovative and effective approach to promote prevention and management of coronary heart disease. However, the magnitude of its effects is unclear. The aim of this systematic review was to examine the impact of mHealth-based cardiac rehabilitation outcomes among coronary heart disease patients. Methods Medline, CINAHL, Embase, PubMed, Google Scholar, NICE, and Cochrane library were searched for randomized controlled trials published between January 2002 and March 2017 which compared mHealth with conventional cardiac rehabilitation programs among coronary heart disease patients. Results Eight articles were included in this review. The impact of mHealth interventions on physical activity, medicine adherence, smoking cessation, level of anxiety, and quality of life was inconsistent among the articles. Conclusions Further research is needed to conclusively determine the impact of mHealth interventions on cardiac rehabilitation outcomes. The limitations of the included studies (e.g., inadequate sample size, failure to address the core components of cardiac rehabilitation programs, and lack of theory-based design) should be taken into account when designing future studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: