Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Bio-based packaging films face challenges in mechanical toughness, service temperature range, and gas barrier properties, which hinder widespread adoption. This study investigates polymer blends that combine flexible poly(butylene adipate-co-furanoate) (PBAF) with either rigid/amorphous poly(isosorbide succinate-co-oxalate) (PISO 10 ) or rigid/crystalline poly(lactic- co -glycolic acid) (PLGA 90 ) for food packaging applications. A stepwise (2 + 1) copolymerization process proves to be practical and scalable for synthesizing PBAF. PBAF 65, selected for its broad service temperature range (−6.7 to 121.7 °C), serves as the flexible matrix in both blend systems. When incorporating 15 wt % content of either PISO 10 or PLGA 90, the blends show high elongation (∼700%), increased modulus (∼3-fold), and improved barrier properties (oxygen and water vapor BIFs of ∼4.3 and ∼0.7, respectively, compared to HDPE). The rigid/amorphous PISO 10 promotes good miscibility with PBAF 65 and maintains a high impact strength, in contrast to the reduced impact strength observed with rigid/crystalline PLGA 90 . Pilot-scale processing of the PBAF 65 /PISO 10 (15) film via twin-screw extrusion and blown film extrusion yields excellent dimensional stability, withstanding hot-fill (∼85 °C) and ice contact (∼5 °C) without defects. This study presents a case in which the selection of suitable rigid/amorphous or rigid/crystalline components enables the tailoring of flexible bio-based polymer blends for high-performance packaging applications, particularly in film form.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kunthong et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: