Why the study?
Does a new baseline GFR <45 mL/min/1.73 m² after renal cancer surgery reduce non-renal cancer-related survival compared to higher GFR?
Does a new baseline GFR <45 mL/min/1.73 m² after renal cancer surgery reduce non-renal cancer-related survival compared to higher GFR?
Patients who develop a new baseline GFR <45 mL/min/1.73 m² after renal cancer surgery have significantly compromised non-renal cancer-related survival, highlighting the importance of nephron-sparing approaches when feasible.
Survival heterogeneity among post-RCS CKD-S patients warrants risk stratification; leaves open which predictors should guide interventions in prospective studies.
Objectives To evaluate predictors of long‐term survival for patients with chronic kidney disease primarily due to surgery ( CKD ‐S). Patients with CKD ‐S have generally good survival that approximates patients who do not have CKD even after renal cancer surgery ( RCS ), yet there may be heterogeneity within this cohort. Patients and Methods From 1997 to 2008, 4 246 patients underwent RCS at our centre. The median (interquartile range [ IQR ]) follow‐up was 9.4 (7.3–11.0) years. New baseline glomerular filtration rate ( GFR ) was defined as highest GFR between nadir and 6 weeks after RCS . We retrospectively evaluated three cohorts: no‐ CKD (new baseline GFR of ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ); CKD ‐S (new baseline GFR of <60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 but preoperative GFR of ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ); and CKD due to medical aetiologies who then require RCS ( CKD ‐M/S, preoperative and new baseline GFR both <60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ). Analysis focused primarily on non‐renal cancer‐related survival ( NRCRS ) for the CKD ‐S cohort. Kaplan–Meier analysis assessed the longitudinal impact of new baseline GFR (45–60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 vs <45 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ) and Cox regression evaluated relative impact of preoperative GFR , new baseline GFR , and relevant demographics/comorbidities. Results Of the 4 246 patients who underwent RCS , 931 had CKD ‐S and 1 113 had CKD ‐M/S, whilst 2 202 had no‐ CKD even after RCS . Partial/radical nephrectomy ( PN / RN ) was performed in 54%/46% of the patients, respectively. For CKD ‐S, 641 patients had a new baseline GFR of 45–60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 and 290 had a new baseline GFR of <45 mL/min/1.73 m 2 . Kaplan–Meier analysis showed significantly reduced NRCRS for patients with CKD ‐S with a GFR of <45 mL/min/1.73 m 2 compared to those with no‐ CKD or CKD ‐S with a GFR of 45–60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 (both P ≤ 0.004), and competing risk analysis confirmed this ( P < 0.001). Age, gender, heart disease, and new baseline GFR were all associated independently with NRCRS for patients with CKD ‐S (all P ≤ 0.02). Conclusion Our data suggest that CKD ‐S is heterogeneous, and patients with a reduced new baseline GFR have compromised survival, particularly if <45 mL/min/1.73 m 2 . Our findings may have implications regarding choice of PN / RN in patients at risk of developing CKD ‐S.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: