Key result
Hybrid, telephone-based cardiac rehabilitation demonstrated significant pre- to post-program differences in body mass index and weight, similar to in-person center-based programming.
Why the study?
The study evaluated the effectiveness of a hybrid, telephone-based cardiac rehabilitation program implemented early in the COVID-19 pandemic compared with prepandemic in-person programming in older adults.
Does a hybrid, telephone-based cardiac rehabilitation program improve body mass index and weight in adults 65 and older compared to in-person cardiac rehabilitation?
Cohort
Does a hybrid, telephone-based cardiac rehabilitation program improve body mass index and weight in adults 65 and older compared to in-person cardiac rehabilitation?
Hybrid telephone-based cardiac rehabilitation is effective for weight management in older adults, though strategies to improve exercise adherence may be needed.
This study was performed to evaluate the effectiveness of a hybrid, telephone-based cardiac rehabilitation (TBCR) program implemented early in the COVID-19 pandemic compared with in-person, center-based programming offered prior to the pandemic. The focus was on older adults' engagement and outcomes. Matched groups of hybrid and in-person cardiac rehabilitation (CR) participants were created from existing data and compared using t-tests and repeated measures ANOVAs. Qualitative interviews were conducted with participating CR staff then transcribed, coded, and analyzed for key themes. There were significant differences in body mass index and weight from pre-to post-CR within both hybrid and in-person groups. Despite this, CR staff believed exercise adherence was reduced in the hybrid group when compared to those in the in-person program. In the future, TBCR should be considered as an adjunct to in-person CR. Reluctance to prescribe exercise needs to be addressed through CR staff training.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ownbey et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Cardiac rehabilitation. Hybrid, telephone-based cardiac rehabilitation vs. In-person, center-based cardiac rehabilitation was evaluated on Body mass index and weight. Hybrid, telephone-based cardiac rehabilitation demonstrated significant pre- to post-program differences in body mass index and weight, similar to in-person center-based programming.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: