Key result
Local pulse wave velocity measured by laser Doppler vibrometry correlated significantly with age (R = 0.432; p = 0.002) and yielded values between 2.5 and 5.8 m/s.
Why the study?
Can laser Doppler vibrometry (LDV) be used to measure local pulse wave velocity (PWV) in the common carotid artery of patients with atherosclerotic disease?
Cross-Sectional (n=48)
Can laser Doppler vibrometry (LDV) be used to measure local pulse wave velocity (PWV) in the common carotid artery of patients with atherosclerotic disease?
Effect estimate: R = 0.432
p-value: p=0.002
Laser Doppler vibrometry is a potentially valid, non-contact method for measuring local pulse wave velocity in the common carotid artery as a marker of arterial stiffness.
Laser Doppler vibrometry may enable noninvasive local PWV assessment; leaves open validation against outcomes in larger cohorts.
A need for screening methods for arteriosclerosis led to the development of several approaches to measure pulse wave velocity (PWV) being indicative of arterial stiffness. Carotid-femoral PWV (cfPWV) can be measured between common carotid artery (CCA) and femoral artery (FA) displaying the physiologically important stiffness of the conduit arteries. However, this measurement approach has several disadvantages, and a local PWV-measurement of CCA-stiffness has been proposed as an alternative in the past. In the presented pilot study, laser Doppler vibrometry (LDV) is used to measure PWV locally in the CCA (PWVLDV) in 48 patients aged between 48 and 70, with known atherosclerotic arterial disease: stabilized coronary artery disease (CAD), cerebro-vascular disease (CVD) or peripheral artery disease (PAD). Additionally, cfPWV, CCA distensibility coefficient (DC), CCA intima-media thickness (IMT), blood pressure (BP) and age were evaluated. LDV is a valid method for local PWV-measurement. The method is potentially easy to use, and causes no discomfort to the patient. PWVLDV correlates with age (R = 0.432; p = 0.002) as reported in related studies using other techniques, and measured values lay between 2.5 and 5.8 m s(-1), which is well in line with literature measures of local PWV in the CCA. In conclusion, PWVLDV potentially is a marker for arterial health, but more research in a larger and more homogeneous patient population is mandatory. In future studies, blood velocity measurements should be incorporated, as well as a reference method such as pulse wave imaging (PWI) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Campo et al. (2016) conducted a cross-sectional in Atherosclerotic arterial disease (n=48). Laser Doppler vibrometry (LDV) for local PWV measurement was evaluated on Correlation of local pulse wave velocity (PWVLDV) with age (R = 0.432, p=0.002). Local pulse wave velocity measured by laser Doppler vibrometry correlated significantly with age (R = 0.432; p = 0.002) and yielded values between 2.5 and 5.8 m/s.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: