The role of imaging in acute aortic syndromes
Key result
Modern contrast-enhanced CT, MR imaging, and ultrasound techniques demonstrate similar diagnostic accuracy near 100% for acute aortic syndromes.
Why the study?
What is the diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive imaging modalities in patients with suspected acute aortic syndrome?
Population
Patients with clinical suspicion of acute aortic syndrome
Design
Review
Authors
Discussion
Loading...
Member takes
Implication
High accuracy supports prompt CT/MR/ultrasound use in suspected acute aortic syndrome; leaves open optimal modality by setting and stability.
Structured PICO
What is the diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive imaging modalities in patients with suspected acute aortic syndrome?
P
Population
Patients with clinical suspicion of acute aortic syndrome (including aortic dissection, intramural haematoma, penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer, and contained aortic rupture)
E
Exposure
Non-invasive imaging (contrast-enhanced CT, MR imaging, and ultrasound techniques)
O
Outcome
Diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity and specificity)
Swift diagnostic imaging with CT, MRI, or ultrasound is crucial and highly accurate (near 100%) for the diagnosis of acute aortic syndromes.
Cite This Study
Christoph Nienaber (2012) conducted a review in acute aortic syndromes. Non-invasive imaging (contrast-enhanced CT, MR imaging, and ultrasound) was evaluated on diagnostic accuracy. Modern contrast-enhanced CT, MR imaging, and ultrasound techniques demonstrate similar diagnostic accuracy near 100% for acute aortic syndromes.