Why the study?
Does magnetic resonance imaging accurately evaluate thoracic aortic dissections compared to CT and angiography in patients with documented dissections?
Population
6 patients with documented dissections of the thoracic aorta (two Type A, four Type B)
Comparison
Magnetic resonance imaging using a 0.6-Tesla… vs CT and angiography
Design
Case_series
Authors
Loading...
MR imaging supports evaluation of thoracic aortic dissections; leaves open prospective validation versus CT in larger cohorts.
Does magnetic resonance imaging accurately evaluate thoracic aortic dissections compared to CT and angiography in patients with documented dissections?
MR imaging is an effective modality for evaluating thoracic aortic dissections, providing detailed anatomical and flow information comparable or superior to CT in most cases.
Geisinger et al. (1985) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: