The authors, as a beta testing site, evaluated the ACS:180-phenytoin chemiluminescent assay (Ciba-Corning Diagnostics Corp., Medfield, MA, U.S.A.) by comparing its performance with a widely used fluorescence assay for phenytoin (Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL, U.S.A.). The ACS:180-phenytoin assays were run on a ACS-180 analyzer and fluorescence polarization assays on a TDx analyzer. The within-run precision for ACS-phenytoin assay was determined using controls obtained from Ciba-Corning. The CVs were 2.9% for low control (mean = 5.5, SD = 0.16 microgram/ml, n = 10), 2.8% for the medium control (mean = 13.4, SD = 0.37 microgram/ml, n = 10), and 2.7% for the high control (mean = 24.6, SD = 0.66 microgram/ml, n = 10). The corresponding between run precisions were 4.1% for the low control (mean = 5.4, SD = 0.22 mg/ml, n = 10), 3.1% for the medium control (mean = 13.8, SD = 0.43 mg/ml, n = 10), and 2.9% (mean = 24.5, SD = 0.70 mg/ml, n = 10) for the high control. The assay was linear from 0.5 to 40 micrograms/ml of serum phenytoin concentrations with a detection limit of 0.24 microgram/ml. The recoveries were 93-97% for concentrations of phenytoin of 5-30 micrograms/ml. They also compared 111 serum specimens collected from patients receiving phenytoin. The concentrations of phenytoin ranged from none detected to 32.4 micrograms/ml. Using fluorescence polarization assay as x-axis (reference method) and ACS:180-phenytoin assay as y-axis, they obtained the following regression line: y = 1.0x - 0.26, r = 0.993. They conclude that the ACS-phenytoin assay has a good precision and that the results correlate well with the fluorescence polarization assay.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dasgupta et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: