Key result
Non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants are noninferior to conventional therapy for acute VTE treatment and effectively reduce recurrent VTE risk during extended therapy with a favorable bleeding profile.
Why the study?
Do non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) reduce recurrent VTE with a favorable bleeding profile compared to conventional therapy in the acute and extended treatment of VTE?
Do non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) reduce recurrent VTE with a favorable bleeding profile compared to conventional therapy in the acute and extended treatment of VTE?
NOACs provide a safe, effective, and convenient alternative to conventional anticoagulation for both the acute and extended long-term treatment of venous thromboembolism.
Supports NOAC preference for acute and extended VTE; confirms and extends randomized evidence on efficacy and safety.
Venous thromboembolism (VTE), which includes both deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism (PE), is a very common disorder with high risk for recurrence and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs), which include dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban, have been shown to be noninferior to conventional anticoagulant therapy for the prevention of recurrent VTE and are associated with more favorable bleeding risk. Evidence from the treatment of VTE with traditional therapy (low molecular weight heparin and vitamin K antagonists) implies that extended or indefinite treatment reduces risk of recurrence. Recently, mounting evidence suggests a role for the extended use of NOACs to reduce the risk of VTE recurrence. This review summarizes the existing evidence for the extended use of NOACs in the treatment of VTE from phase III extension studies with dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban. Additionally, it examines and discusses the major society guidelines and how these recommendations may change physician practices in the near future.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bromley et al. (2018) conducted a review in Venous thromboembolism. Non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) vs. Conventional therapy (LMWH/VKA), placebo, or aspirin was evaluated. Non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants are noninferior to conventional therapy for acute VTE treatment and effectively reduce recurrent VTE risk during extended therapy with a favorable bleeding profile.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: