Key result
Continuous and interval exercise training resulted in similar significant increases in oxygen uptake efficiency slope among patients with coronary artery disease (P<0.05).
Why the study?
Does continuous exercise training compared to interval exercise training improve oxygen uptake efficiency slope in patients with coronary artery disease?
RCT (n=35)
Randomly divided
Does continuous exercise training compared to interval exercise training improve oxygen uptake efficiency slope in patients with coronary artery disease?
p-value: p=<0.05
Both continuous and interval exercise training are similarly effective at improving the oxygen uptake efficiency slope in patients with coronary artery disease.
May offer flexibility in CAD exercise prescriptions; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation before practice change.
The oxygen uptake efficiency slope (OUES) is a submaximal index incorporating cardiovascular, peripheral, and pulmonary factors that determine the ventilatory response to exercise. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of continuous exercise training and interval exercise training on the OUES in patients with coronary artery disease. Thirty-five patients (59.3±1.8 years old; 28 men, 7 women) with coronary artery disease were randomly divided into two groups: continuous exercise training (n=18) and interval exercise training (n=17). All patients performed graded exercise tests with respiratory gas analysis before and 3 months after the exercise-training program to determine ventilatory anaerobic threshold (VAT), respiratory compensation point, and peak oxygen consumption (peak VO2). The OUES was assessed based on data from the second minute of exercise until exhaustion by calculating the slope of the linear relation between oxygen uptake and the logarithm of total ventilation. After the interventions, both groups showed increased aerobic fitness (P<0.05). In addition, both the continuous exercise and interval exercise training groups demonstrated an increase in OUES (P<0.05). Significant associations were observed in both groups: 1) continuous exercise training (OUES and peak VO2 r=0.57; OUES and VO2 VAT r=0.57); 2) interval exercise training (OUES and peak VO2 r=0.80; OUES and VO2 VAT r=0.67). Continuous and interval exercise training resulted in a similar increase in OUES among patients with coronary artery disease. These findings suggest that improvements in OUES among CAD patients after aerobic exercise training may be dependent on peripheral and central mechanisms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Prado et al. (2016) conducted an RCT in Coronary artery disease (n=35). Continuous exercise training vs. Interval exercise training was evaluated on Oxygen uptake efficiency slope (OUES) (p=<0.05). Continuous and interval exercise training resulted in similar significant increases in oxygen uptake efficiency slope among patients with coronary artery disease (P<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: