Key result
In senile patients with VTE, rivaroxaban and apixaban reduced major bleeding risk by 73% and 77% versus VKA, while dabigatran increased the risk 4.8-fold.
Why the study?
Do direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) reduce the risk of major bleeding compared to vitamin K antagonists in challenging patients with venous thromboembolism?
Do direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) reduce the risk of major bleeding compared to vitamin K antagonists in challenging patients with venous thromboembolism?
Rivaroxaban appears to retain its safety advantage over VKA in challenging VTE patients (elderly, renal impairment, fragile), whereas dabigatran and apixaban may increase bleeding risk in certain subgroups.
May guide NOAC selection in senile VTE patients; leaves open randomized confirmation of differential bleeding risks.
The paper is a narrative review of the literature on the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for the VTE treatment in challenging patients: senile age (≥75 years), impaired renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate ≤50 ml/min), fragility (one of the previous characteristics and/or bodyweight ≤50 kg). The paper discusses the studies of EINSTEIN DVT and PE (rivaroxaban), AMPLIFY (apixaban), HOKUSAI-VTE (edoxaban), RE-COVER I and II (dabigatran) in the focus of the secondary analysis in the pre-specified patient's subgroups, as well as their pooled analyzes and meta-analyzes. Based on the results of this review, it was concluded that in a subgroup of senile age patients, dabigatran increases the risk of major bleeding by 4.8 times and has no advantages over vitamin K antagonists (VKA); rivaroxaban and apixaban retain superiority over VKA on the safety outcomes and reduce the risk of major bleeding by 73% and 77%. In the subgroup of patients with impaired renal function, the use of apixaban and dabigatran is associated with an increase in the risk of major bleeding by 6.5 and 7.3 times, and these DOACs do not have advantages over VKA; rivaroxaban retains its superiority over VKA and reduces the risk of major bleeding by 78%. For fragile patients, a secondary analysis is available only for rivaroxaban, which remains superior to VKA on safety endpoints and reduces the risk of major bleeding by 73%. In the absence of direct comparisons between the available DOACs, the presented data can be used as a rational approach for the choice of appropriate treatment for VTE in challenging patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schastlivtsev et al. (2020) conducted a review in Venous thromboembolism. Direct oral anticoagulants (rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban, dabigatran) vs. Vitamin K antagonists (VKA) was evaluated on Major bleeding. In senile patients with VTE, rivaroxaban and apixaban reduced major bleeding risk by 73% and 77% versus VKA, while dabigatran increased the risk 4.8-fold.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: