This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
As community-engaged and community-driven research grows in the Arctic, research collaborations increasingly encounter ethical dilemmas that extend beyond procedural ethics guidelines, which require nuanced and culturally-sensitive navigation. Early-career researchers and students play a critical role in community research collaborations in the Arctic, but often do not receive structured guidance on ethical decision-making in cross-cultural settings. In this manuscript we draw from our diverse experiences in community-engaged research to examine underpinnings of common ethical dilemmas, including managing power imbalances across research teams and community partnerships; encountering and addressing harassment and discrimination; attending to mental health and safety during research activities; and navigating resource (in)equity. We highlight the need for intentional trust-building, reflexivity exercises, and team-based exploration of principles to address ethical dilemmas in community-engaged research settings. Additionally, we provide examples of dilemmas and questions to guide ethics discussions for Arctic research teams, including students and early-career researchers. Establishing clear team guidelines for ethical decision-making and equipping team members with the skills to navigate ethical challenges can foster more equitable research collaborations with Arctic communities, and lay the foundation for co-generating ethical standards with community partners.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peterson et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: